I
have been struggling with two distinct but complementary tasks of summary:
writing a research abstract and a novel synopsis. In both cases, I must capture the key points
of a much longer work. I must provide
the busy reader with the highlights and also stimulate an interest to read
more. Perhaps most difficult of all, I
must give away the ending.
The
abstract gives a 300 word version of a 3500 word article. It follows a predetermined structure with the
background, methods, results, and conclusions of my research study. The essence of a work that took two years to
complete must be distilled into a form that takes ten minutes to read. I have to admit that although the details are
of great importance to me, they are not necessarily wanted by the reader.
The
synopsis is an even more daunting challenge.
I have more experience reading and writing research abstracts. I have internalized the expectations and know
how to meet them. I am much less
familiar with the literary world.
Synopses are not published with their novels, as abstracts accompany
their papers. They are read primarily by
publishers and agents. I have never
played either of these roles and have, at best, a hazy impression of them.
In
addition, the synopsis must summarize a 120,000 word book. It has taken four years to write and has
existed in some cognitive form for even longer.
All the subtleties of characterization, sub-plot development, imagery,
and texture must be sacrificed in squeezing it down into a few pages. It is not a pleasant task.
However,
it is necessary. In order to send my
intellectual works (both scholarly and literary) into the world, they must be
accompanied by their summaries. I am
sure it is good for me in some way to go through this process, attempting to
discern the most important elements and convey them to others with no prior
knowledge of their source. Even so, I
will be happier when I am done!
No comments:
Post a Comment